NATO Prepares For a New War ?




NATO preps for new war

Syrian chief warns attack will set Middle East aflame

Comment by Adamantine:

It would seem to be hubris to consider an attack on Syria. Most prophecy watchers would think this might be the harbinger of the Damascus war. I do not know. It sure seems like playing with fire to me.


6 thoughts on “NATO Prepares For a New War ?

  1. Funny how The Global Centre for Responsibility to protect is running around deciding who to attack.
    In the link it says: The Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect is the world’s leading champion of the military doctrine.

    Check this out from 2008….
    Council of the European Union.
    Brussels, 14 Feb 2008.

    Javier Solana,
    EU High Representative for the CFSP,
    Welcomes today’s launch of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect.

    “I welcome the launch today of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. The Centre will help to ensure that the concept of the Responsibility to Protect, which was adopted at the 2005 World Summit, is further developed and applied by the international community.

    The responsibility to Protect means that all States must exercise their sovereignty with responsibility and that the international community will not stand by and allow other States to inflict harm on their own populations. The Centre’s mission to promote and catalyze international action to prevent and halt crimes against humanity is shared by the EU.
    “It is not enough foe the international community merely to say “never again” when atrocities are committed. We have to fulfill our Responsibility to protect with action to prevent crimes against humanity”

    Link: Just search s058/08 and you will see the pdf.

    Looks like its a good situation for…
    Daniel 8:25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.

    Cheers 🙂


  2. thanks for that retro piece lafreak. i think he has an ego large enough to be greatly used by evil—perhaps he’ll get his chance to become that ultimate instrument………………….time will tell.


  3. “Assad Threatens Israel, US if NATO Attacks

    Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad threatened to ‘rain missiles’ on Tel Aviv if NATO or the US attacks Syria.”

    Isaiah 17 I’d say is the virtually guaranteed outcome if this takes place. With the huge stockpile of missiles that we know Assad and Hezbollah are holding – It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to guess how Israel would respond to a sudden, shocking huge attack. They’d be fools to not nuke Damascus and overwelmingly destroy Assad and Hezbollah’s ability to wage war against them. This is not 1967 anymore where a few rockets will go back and forth and a few jet sorties will fly over each others cities. Remember the Gulf War and how quickly the allies flooded over Iraq – and the Iraq war and the “shock and awe” campaign. The way that modern wars are being fought is changing – and with the reduction of the threat of a soviet nuclear response – there is much less disincentive for Israel to respond decisively and possibly with a nuclear weapon to any large scale attack that could threaten it’s existence.


  4. The Samson Option is a term used to describe Israel’s alleged deterrence strategy of massive retaliation with nuclear weapons as a “last resort” against nations whose military attacks threaten its existence, and possibly against other targets as well.
    [1] Israel refuses to admit it has nuclear weapons or to describe how it would use them, an official policy of nuclear ambiguity, also known as “nuclear opacity.” This has made it difficult for anyone outside the Israeli government to definitively describe its true nuclear policy, while still allowing Israel to influence the perceptions, strategies and actions of other governments.

    Israel have threatened to use it in the past. They have nukes on land sea and air encase the country is crushed they can still launch. Apparently their range can reach right across Europe, Russia and the Middle east.
    How many nukes do they have? who really knows but it is apparently allot.
    In my opinion they wont need to use that option as Jesus should hopefully return before that point.


  5. That’s what I was thinking of – though I don’t think a limited but crushing strike on the primary source of an in progress is out of the realm of plausibility- short of the the more extensive “Samson Option”.


  6. Seen in EU observer today –
    Putin unveils counter-EU option for post-Soviet states

    Maybe they can name it Magog – and invite Turkey to join.

    and in light of this
    Libya war is Nato conquest of oil-rich south, Russian diplomat says

    We can see that we aren’t the only ones noticing that Europe is taking an influence in Libya, Egypt, and others that some find very threatening.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s